Quality Assurance

Program Level

Score Quality Level
0.01-2.00 Low
2.01-3.00 Medium
3.01-4.00 Good
4.01-5.00 Very Good
Program/Academic Year 2557
 2558 2559 2560 2561
 2562
 2563
 2564 Target Score
English Communication (B.A.) 0.92 3.11 3.13 2.80 2.48 1.74
 1.68
 3.28 >=3.01
Information Technology (B.Sc.) 1.62 3.04 3.37 3.13 3.04 0.00 2.53
 3.33 >=3.01
Hospitality Industry Management (B.B.A.) 1.45 1.82 3.09 2.88 3.29 3.25 3.20 3.14 >=3.01
International Business Management (B.B.A.) 1.66 2.54 3.16 3.19 3.21 3.15 3.11 3.34 >=3.01
Linguistics (M.A.) 2.11 3.24 3.50 3.45 3.36 3.79 3.38 3.07 >=3.01
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (M.A.) 2.12 2.83 3.17 3.14 3.22 3.28 3.65 3.36 >=3.01
Peacebuilding (Ph.D.) 0.00 2.33 3.04 2.05 3.12 – – – >=3.01
Average Scores
 1.41 3.02 3.69 3.54 3.10 2.54
 2.93
 3.25 >=3.01

Faculty Level

Score Quality Level
0.01-1.50 Urgently Needs Improvement
1.51-2.50 Needs Improvement
2.51-3.50 Fair
3.51-4.50 Good
4.51-5.00 Very Good
Components 2557
 2558 2559 2560 2561
 2562
 2563
 2564 Target Score
1. Graduation Production 2.27 2.70 3.41 3.38 3.45 3.33
 3.32   3.33 >=3.51
2. Research 2.84 3.70 4.17 3.25 4.05 3.24  3.23  3.38 >=3.51
3. Academic Service 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00  3.00  3.00  4.00  >=3.51
4. Preservation of Arts and Culture 4.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00  4.00  4.00 4.00 >=3.51
5. Administration and Management 3.50 3.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.00 >=3.51
Assessment Results 2.78
 3.02 3.69 3.54 3.60  3.51  3.51 3.54 >=3.51

Framework for International Quality Assurance: Curriculum / Program of Studies Level

 

Quality Assurance Components for Curriculum/Program Indicators Describe the Process or Show Operational Results for Relevant Issues
1. Regulatory Standards 1.1 Curricular Management in Accordance with the Standard Criteria Stipulated by OHEC Curricular Management Results in Accordance with Standard Criteria Undergraduate – 3 Criteria Graduate – 11 Criteria
2. Graduates 2.1 Graduate Quality in Accordance with the Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education. – Assessment results of graduate quality per Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (graduate employers/stakeholders)
2.2 Graduates’ Employment or Research Output – Employment or self-employment results of Bachelor graduates
– Publication/dissemination results of Master/Doctoral graduates
3. Students 3.1 Student Admissions – Student admissions
– Preparations before commencement of studies
3.2 Student Support and Development – Supervision of academic advising and guidance to undergraduate students
– Supervision of thesis and independent study advising for graduate students
– Development of student potential and building 21st century learning skills
3.3 Results Experienced by Students – Student retention rate
– Graduation rate
– Student satisfaction and results of handling student complaints
4. Instructors 4.1 Management and Development of Instructors – Recruitment/appointment of full-time program instructors for a curriculum
– Management of instructors
– Encouragement and Development of instructors
4.2 Instructor Quality – Percentage of instructors holding doctoral degrees
– Percentage of instructors holding academic rank
– Academic output of instructors
– Number of articles by full-time doctoral program instructors referenced on TCI and Scopus per total number of full-time program instructors
4.3 Results Experienced by Instructors – Instructor retention rate
– Instructor satisfaction
5. Curriculum, Learning and Teaching, Learner Assessment 5.1 Content of Courses in the Curriculum – Curricular design concept, information used to develop curriculum, and curricular objectives
– Curriculum updated per progress in field of study
– Approval of thesis and independent study topics in graduate programs
5.2 Establishment of an instructional System for Instructors and a Process for Learning and Teaching – Instructor teaching assignments
– Supervising, monitoring, and inspecting preparation of learning plans (TQF 3 and TQF 4); learning/teaching management
– Learning/teaching management in bachelor programs that integrates research, academic service to society and preservation of arts and culture
– Supervising graduate program thesis and independent study topics so they correspond with fields of study, and progress in academic disciplines
– Appointing graduate program thesis and independent study advisors who have knowledge and expertise in harmony with/related to thesis topics
– Assisting, overseeing, and following up the production of theses and independent study projects, and publication of research results in graduate programs
5.3 Learner Assessment – Assessment of learning outcomes according to Thai Qualifications Framework
– Verifying learning outcome assessment of students
– Supervising assessment of learning/teaching, curricula (TQF 5, TQF 6, and TQF 7)
5.4 Curriculum Operational Results According to the Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education – Assessment of theses and independent studies in graduate programs
– Operational results indicators per Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education
6. Learning Resources 6.1 Learning Resources – Operational system of Department/ Faculty/ Institution with involvement of full-time program instructors to provide learning resources
– Learning resources are adequate and appropriate for learning/teaching
– Improvement process to follow up student/instructor satisfaction results with learning resources provided

Framework for International Quality Assurance: Faculty Level

Faculty Level quality assurance consists of curriculum/program of studies operational results, supplemented by Faculty-Level performance indicators for a total of 13 indicators as follows:

Quality Assurance Components for Faculties Indicators Remarks Form
1. Graduate Production 1.1 Results of Overall Curricular Management
1.2 Full-Time Instructors in Faculty with Doctoral Degrees
1.3 Full-Time Instructors in Faculty with Academic Rank
1.4 Number of Full-Time Equivalent Students to Number of Full-Time Instructors
1.5 Services Provided to Undergraduate Students
1.6 Undergraduate Student Activities Student Development Plan
2. Research 2.1 System and Mechanism to Administer and Develop Research or Creative Works
2.2 Financial Support for Research and Creative Works
2.3 Academic Output of Full-Time Instructors and Researchers All types of academic output per full-time instructor and researcher  https://goo.gl/forms/6BTlO0ACCbmoHbmT2
3. Academic Services 3.1 Academic Service to Society – Academic Service Plan (includes at least one free to the public)

– KM project/activities

 AcademicService-PYU03 Form-ENG (Research Office)
4. Preservation of Arts and Culture 4.1 System and Mechanisms to Preserve Arts and Culture – Culture and Arts Preservation Plan
5. Administration and Management 5.1 Faculty Management to Oversee and Monitor Outcomes per Mission, Institutional Group, and Faculty Identity – IC Annual Plan (includes Staff & Faculty Development Plan) RM_form_project_61_new_ENG
5.2 System to Oversee Quality Assurance at Curriculum Level

Definitions of Terms

Appendix

Links

Last modified on: Sep 8, 2022 @ 3:41 PM